0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground: The association between monounsaturated fat (MUFA) intake and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether MUFA from plant foods (MUFA-P) and animal foods (MUFA-A) show different associations with CHD risk in two large prospective studies of U.S. men and women. Method: We calculated MUFA-P and MUFA-A among 60,931 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1990-2012), and 28,445 men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1990-2010). Diet was assessed by validated food-frequency questionnaire every 4 years. CHD incidence was self-reported and confirmed by review of medical records or death certificates. Result: MUFA-A (median intake: 5.8-6.1% energy) was highly correlated with saturated fat (SFA; spearman correlation [ r ] =0.81-0.83) but not polyunsaturated fat (PUFA, r =0.04 -0.19), whereas MUFA-P intake (median: 5.3-5.4.9% energy) was strongly correlated with PUFA(r=0.61 for both cohorts) but not SFA ( r =0.20-0.21; All P<0.001). In multivariate models adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and dietary factors, hazard ratios of CHD (HR, 95% confidence interval[95%CI]) from low to high total MUFA quintiles were 1 (reference), 0.92 (0.83, 1.02), 1.03 (0.93, 1.05), 0.89 (0.79,1.00). 0.95(0.873, 1.08; P trend =0.42). For MUFA P these were 1(reference), 0.98 (0.89, 1.07), 0.90 (0.82, 0.99), 0.85 (0.77, 0.93), and 0.86 (0.78, 0.94; P trend <0.001) and for MUFA-A 1(reference), 1.09 (0.99, 1.20), 1.22 (1.11, 1.35), 1.26 (1.13, 1.39), and 1.33 (1.19, 1.48; P trend <0.001). In the energy-density model, CHD risk was lower when MUFA-P iso-calorically replaced 1% energy from total SFA (HR [95%CI]: 0.96[0.92, 1.00]; P=0.03), with no significant changes when MUFA-A replacing SFA (HR [95%CI]: 1.01[0.95, 1.07]; P=0.76). When grouping fat intake as the sum of animal MUFA plus saturated fat and the sum of plant MUFA plus PUFA, the HR (95%CI) of CHD was 0.96 (0.95, 0.98; P<0.001) for replacing 1% energy from the former with the latter. Conclusion: Because MUFA compositions of animal and plant origins are largely similar, our data suggested other components in plant and animal foods may lead to the observed different associations of MUFA-P and MUFA-A with CHD risk. These findings provided a possible explanation on current controversies regarding MUFA intake and CHD risk, and further support health benefit of MUFA intake.
Geng Zong, Yanping Li, Anne J. Wanders, Peter L. Zock, Laura Sampson, Walter C. Willett, Frank B Hu, Qi Sun (2017). Abstract MP054: Associations of Monounsaturated Fat From Plant and Animal Sources With Coronary Heart Disease Risk. , 135(suppl_1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.135.suppl_1.mp054.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2017
Authors
8
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.135.suppl_1.mp054
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access