0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessWhile most molecules and solids are spin-unpolarized, most chemically-active atoms are partly spin-polarized. As a result, the errors of the spin-dependence of a density functional are much more troublesome for atomization energies than they are for typical reaction or formation energies. This observation explains why the atomization energy errors of approximate functionals do not correlate with their other errors, and why the errors of atomization energies for a given functional can be radically reduced by fitting the energies of the atoms. We present an illustrative example from the recent nonempirical construction of the SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation.
John P Perdew, Jianwei Sun, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, Pál D. Mezei, Gábor I. Csonka (2015). Why Density Functionals Should Not Be Judged Primarily by Atomization Energies. , 60(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/ppch.8356.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2015
Authors
5
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3311/ppch.8356
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access