0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessMidge larvae (Diptera, Chironomidae) that weave filamentous algae into retreats of tufts, are dominant primary consumers in a river food web. In a previous study, densities of tuft—weaving midges increased in the presence of large fish. In the absence of large fish, midges decreased as densities of predatory invertebrates built up, and higher standing crops of algae were maintained. To examine the mechanisms underlying these dynamics, we compared the vulnerability of tuft—weaving midges (naked or in algal tufts) to fish and predatory invertebrates, in field and laboratory experiments. When midges were exposed for 1 h in the river to fish, 15 out of 15 midges in tufts survived, while 15 of 15 naked midges were consumed. Tufts afforded only partial protection to midges exposed to invertebrate predators, however. After 1 h, enhancement of survivorship by tufts was moderately significant for midges exposed to aeshnids, and insignificant for midges exposed to lestids and naucorids. We suggest that the vulnerability of tuft—weaving midges to invertebrate predators, and their relative invulnerability to fish, sets the stage for trophic cascades observed in the system. Fish, by consuming small predators, release midges, which graze down algae. The strong effects of fish as fourth—level consumers would not be predicted from their diets, in which algivorous mayflies dominate (>60% of the insect biomass found in each of the two most common fish species). Nevertheless, fish in this food web act as fourth—level, rather than third—level, consumers because of the differential vulnerability of one guild of primary consumer, which, when released from predation, can suppress plants.
Mary E Power, Jane C. Marks, Michael S. Parker (1992). Variation in the Vulnerability of Prey to Different Predators: Community‐Level Consequences. , 73(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941469.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
1992
Authors
3
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2307/1941469
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access