Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2018

Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2018
Vol 25 (9)
Vol. 25
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0228-9

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta

Institution not specified

Verified
Abraham Nunes
Hugo G. Schnack
Christopher R. K. Ching
+71 more

Abstract

Bipolar disorders (BDs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and disability. Objective biological markers, such as those based on brain imaging, could aid in clinical management of BD. Machine learning (ML) brings neuroimaging analyses to individual subject level and may potentially allow for their diagnostic use. However, fair and optimal application of ML requires large, multi-site datasets. We applied ML (support vector machines) to MRI data (regional cortical thickness, surface area, subcortical volumes) from 853 BD and 2167 control participants from 13 cohorts in the ENIGMA consortium. We attempted to differentiate BD from control participants, investigated different data handling strategies and studied the neuroimaging/clinical features most important for classification. Individual site accuracies ranged from 45.23% to 81.07%. Aggregate subject-level analyses yielded the highest accuracy (65.23%, 95% CI = 63.47-67.00, ROC-AUC = 71.49%, 95% CI = 69.39-73.59), followed by leave-one-site-out cross-validation (accuracy = 58.67%, 95% CI = 56.70-60.63). Meta-analysis of individual site accuracies did not provide above chance results. There was substantial agreement between the regions that contributed to identification of BD participants in the best performing site and in the aggregate dataset (Cohen's Kappa = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.829-0.831). Treatment with anticonvulsants and age were associated with greater odds of correct classification. Although short of the 80% clinically relevant accuracy threshold, the results are promising and provide a fair and realistic estimate of classification performance, which can be achieved in a large, ecologically valid, multi-site sample of BD participants based on regional neurostructural measures. Furthermore, the significant classification in different samples was based on plausible and similar neuroanatomical features. Future multi-site studies should move towards sharing of raw/voxelwise neuroimaging data.

How to cite this publication

Abraham Nunes, Hugo G. Schnack, Christopher R. K. Ching, Ingrid Agartz, Theophilus N. Akudjedu, Martin Alda, Dag Alnæs, Sílvia Alonso-Lana, Jochen Bauer, Bernhard T. Baune, Erlend Bøen, Caterina del Mar Bonnín, Geraldo F. Busatto, Erick J. Canales‐Rodríguez, Dara M. Cannon, Xavier Caseras, Tiffany Chaim-Avancini, Udo Dannlowski, Ana M. Díaz‐Zuluaga, Bruno Dietsche, Nhat Trung Doan, Édouard Duchesnay, Torbjørn Elvsåshagen, Daniel Emden, Lisa T. Eyler, Mar Fatjó‐Vilas, Pauline Favre, Sonya Foley, Janice M. Fullerton, David C. Glahn, José Manuel Goikolea, Dominik Grotegerd, Tim Hahn, Chantal Henry, Derrek P. Hibar, Josselin Houenou, Fleur M. Howells, Neda Jahanshad, Tobias Kaufmann, Joanne Kenney, Tilo Kircher, Axel Krug, Trine Vik Lagerberg, Rhoshel Lenroot, Carlos López‐Jaramillo, Rodrigo Machado‐Vieira, Ulrik Fredrik Malt, Colm McDonald, Philip B. Mitchell, Benson Mwangi, Leila Nabulsi, Nils Opel, Bronwyn J. Overs, Julian A. Pineda‐Zapata, Edith Pomarol‐Clotet, Ronny Redlich, Gloria Roberts, Pedro G. P. Rosa, Raymond Salvador, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Jair C. Soares, Dan Joseph Stein, Henk Temmingh, Thomas Trappenberg, Anne Uhlmann, Neeltje E.M. van Haren, Eduard Vieta, Lars T. Westlye, Daniel H. Wolf, Dilara Yüksel, Marcus V. Zanetti, Ole A. Andreassen, Paul M. Thompson, Tomáš Hájek (2018). Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group. , 25(9), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0228-9.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2018

Authors

74

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0228-9

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access