0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessABSTRACT Our understanding of habitat selection in wild vertebrates has been heavily influenced by observations of preferred foraging areas. However, foraging is only one of many ways animals interact with their environment, and preferences for habitat features that support resting, breeding, and safety, along with trade-offs between these needs, remain underexplored. These trade-offs are likely to be particularly acute in complex environments where these needs are met in different locations. Using a long-term dataset of movements and life history, we examine how preferences for foraging areas and burrow sites shape space use in Kalahari meerkats ( Suricata suricatta ). Meerkats cannot dig new sleeping and breeding burrows and must use those abandoned by other species, potentially generating trade-offs in daily space use if overnight refuges are far from optimal foraging areas. We find that space use is strongly anchored by burrow location, with burrows in calcareous pans and dry riverbed (“white sand”) habitat being preferred year-round and showing lower burrow switching rates. However, white sand areas were not preferred for foraging, and yielded lower weight gains, particularly during the dry season. As a result, meerkats faced a trade-off between optimal burrow locations and productive foraging grounds, as indicated by faster, longer, and more energetically costly travel when moving through or waking up in white sands. Our results suggest that changes in the distribution or abundance of key burrow-constructing species in desert environments may have cascading effects on the many secondary burrow-using species that depend on them for survival and reproduction. More broadly, our results highlight that limited refuge availability across the landscape can impose strong ecological constraints on animals and may restrict behavioural plasticity under environmental change, particularly if productive foraging areas shift.
Jack Thorley, Chris Duncan, Annika Herdtle, Marta Manser, Tim Clutton-brock, Christopher Duncan (2025). The bind of the burrow: space use is dominated by selection for burrow habitat over foraging habitat in an arid-adapted carnivore. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.26.690549.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
6
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.26.690549
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access