0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been associated with alterations in amygdala and hippocampal volume but there is mixed evidence for the direction of volumetric alterations. Additionally, little is known about the involvement of the distinct subfields in the pathophysiology of SAD. Volumetric data from a large multi-centre sample of 107 adult individuals with SAD and 140 healthy controls (HCs) was segmented using FreeSurfer to produce 9 amygdala and 12 hippocampal subfield volumes. Volumes were compared between groups using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, age-squared, sex, site and whole amygdala and hippocampal volumes. Subgroup analyses examined subfield volumes in relation to comorbid anxiety disorder, and comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), psychotropic medication status, and symptom severity. In the full sample, SAD was associated with smaller amygdala volumes in the basal ( d=- 0.32, p FDR =0.022), accessory basal ( d=- 0.42, p FDR =0.005) and corticoamygdaloid transition area ( d=- 0.37, p FDR =0.014), and larger hippocampal volume in the CA3 ( d= 0.34, p FDR =0.024), CA4 ( d= 0.44, p FDR =0.007), dentate gyrus ( d= 0.35, p FDR =0.022) and molecular layer ( d= 0.28, p FDR = 0.033), compared to HCs. SAD without comorbid anxiety, in addition, demonstrated smaller lateral amygdala ( d=- 0.30, p FDR =0.037) and hippocampal amygdala transition area ( d=- 0.33, p FDR =0.027) relative to HCs. In SAD without comorbid MDD, only the smaller accessory basal amygdala remained significant ( d=- 0.41, p FDR =0.017). No association was found between subfield volume and medication status or symptom severity. In conclusion, we observed distinct patterns of volumetric differences across specific amygdala and hippocampal subfields, regions that are associated with sensory information processing, threat evaluation and fear generalization. These findings suggest a possible disruption in information flow between the amygdala and hippocampal formation for fear processing in SAD.
Ziphozihle Ntwatwa, Jule M. Spreckelmeyer, Janna Marie Bas‐Hoogendam, Jack van Honk, Mary M. Mufford, Carl‐Johan Boraxbekk, Jean‐Paul Fouché, Andreas Frick, Tomas Furmark, Heide Klumpp, Christine Löchner, K. Luan Phan, Kristoffer Månsson, J. Nienke Pannekoek, Jutta Peterburs, Karin Roelofs, Annerine Roos, Thomas Straube, Henk van Steenbergen, Marie‐José van Tol, Dick J. Veltman, Nic J. A. van der Wee, Dan Joseph Stein, Jonathan Ipser, Nynke A. Groenewold (2024). Specific amygdala and hippocampal subfield volumes in social anxiety disorder and their relation to clinical characteristics – an international mega-analysis. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.576056.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2024
Authors
25
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.576056
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access