0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract This work presents a computational screening approach to identify Li‐rich transition‐metal oxide sacrificial cathode additives and provides experimental validation of antifluorite‐structured Li 6 MnO 4 as a potential candidate. Initial attempts to synthesize this compound result in low purity (≤40% by weight) owing to close thermodynamic competition with Li 2 O and MnO at low temperature. However, it is shown that a much higher purity of 85% by weight can be achieved by combining Li excess with rapid cooling from high temperature, which effectively stabilizes the Li 6 MnO 4 phase. The synthesized product delivers a high irreversible Li release capacity that exceeds 700 mAh g −1 by utilizing combined Mn oxidation (Mn 2+/3+ and Mn 3+/4+ ) and O oxidation. These results demonstrate that Li 6 MnO 4 may therefore be useful as a potential sacrificial cathode additive in Li‐ion batteries and motivate further investigation of other structurally‐related compounds. While attempts were made to synthesize two additional compounds among computationally screened candidates, it was not successful to experimentally realize the two candidates. The difficulty of experimental realization of the newly predicted materials remains a challenge and it is suggested that more efforts need to be devoted to developing computational techniques to precisely predict synthesizability and propose potential synthetic routes of the predicted materials.
Haegyeom Kim, KyuJung Jun, Nathan J Szymanski, Venkata Sai Avvaru, Zijian Cai, Matthew J. Crafton, Gi‐Hyeok Lee, Stephen E. Trask, Finn Babbe, Young‐Woon Byeon, Peichen Zhong, Donghun Lee, Byungchun Park, Wangmo Jung, Bryan D. McCloskey, Wanli Yang (2025). Screening and Development of Sacrificial Cathode Additives for Lithium‐Ion Batteries. , 15(21), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202403946.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
16
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202403946
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access