Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Reply to Comment on “Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981–1999” by J. R. Ahlbeck

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2002

Reply to Comment on “Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981–1999” by J. R. Ahlbeck

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2002
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Vol 107 (D11)
DOI: 10.1029/2001jd001516

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Compton Tucker
Compton Tucker

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Verified
Robert K. Kaufmann
Liming Zhou
Compton Tucker
+3 more

Abstract

[1] Ahlbeck [2002] raises an important issue: Is the increase in the atmospheric concentration of CO2 [Keeling and Whorf, 2001] partially responsible for the increase in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which we report in the work of Zhou et al. [2001]? To demonstrate its effect, Ahlbeck [2002] adds the atmospheric concentration of CO2 (hereinafter referred to as CO2) to equation (11) in the Zhou et al. [2001] article. Ahlbeck [2002] finds that CO2 is correlated with NDVI and concludes that "fertilizing due to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration also may increase greenness." As described below, this conclusion, and the results on which it is based, is a statistical artifact. When the regression equation is specified correctly, we find that there is no relation between the NDVI and the atmospheric concentration of CO2. [4] Why does the presence of a time trend eliminate the statistical significance of CO2? The answer can be seen in the work of Ahlbeck [2002, Figure 1]. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 rises steadily over the sample period, 1982–1999. As such, CO2 "looks like" a time trend. As such, the two variables in equation (2) are highly correlated. The resulting colinearity causes ordinary least squares to overstate the size of the standard errors associated with β1 and β3. Under these conditions, the regression coefficients appear to be statistically insignificant. [6] If CO2 affects NDVI (and not some other variable that "looks like" a time trend), movements in CO2 which are faster or slower than the linear time trend will have explanatory power about NDVI beyond the explanatory power of the linear time trend; that is, if CO2 does affect NDVI, NDVI should rise faster than predicted by the linear time trend in years when CO2 increases faster than the time trend. Similarly, NDVI should increase slower than predicted by the linear time trend in years when CO2 increases slower than the time trend. [8] When equation (4) is estimated from data for North America and Eurasia, the estimate for β3 is not statistically different from zero. This result indicates that movements in CO2, faster or slower than a time trend have no explanatory power about NDVI beyond a time trend. This implies that the result found by Ahlbeck [2002] is caused by the similarity between CO2 and a time trend during the sample period, and not the effect of CO2 on NDVI. [10] We recognize that the interpretation of the statistical results described above is limited by the small sample size of the North American and Eurasian data sets. These limits can be alleviated by combining the two data sets and using F tests to evaluate whether the coefficients estimated from the North American data set are equal to those estimated from the Eurasian data set [Hsiao, 1986]. These F tests indicate that we cannot reject restrictions that equalize the coefficients other than the intercepts for equations (1), (2), (4), and (5). Under these conditions, the equations can be estimated from the combined data set using a fixed effects estimator. This allows us to estimate results that have more than twice the degrees of freedom than those estimated from the individual data sets. These results confirm those described above (Table 1). [11] Together, these results indicate that there is no evidence that increases in the atmospheric concentration of CO2 are responsible for the increases in NDVI described by Zhou et al. [2001]. Although CO2 correlates with NDVI, the relation described by Ahlbeck [2002] is a coincidence based on the similarity between CO2 and a linear time trend. The mechanism that lays behind the linear increase in NDVI is uncertain but could include forest regrowth following the effects of human disturbance and/or the decay of the increase in aerosol optical depth associated with the volcanic eruption of El Chichon at the start of the sample period (L. Zhou et al., manuscript in preparation, 2001).

How to cite this publication

Robert K. Kaufmann, Liming Zhou, Compton Tucker, D. A. Slayback, Nikolay V. Shabanov, Ranga B. Myneni (2002). Reply to Comment on “Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981–1999” by J. R. Ahlbeck. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 107(D11), DOI: 10.1029/2001jd001516.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2002

Authors

6

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

DOI

10.1029/2001jd001516

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access