Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessWe aimed to assess possible differences in neointimal quality after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BVS) implantation in comparison with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting scaffold (CoCr-EES) implantation by optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI).This study is a post hoc analysis of the TROFI II trial assessing neointimal quality six months after the implantation of BVS (N=82) and CoCr-EES (N=87) in STEMI patients. Neointimal light property analysis by OFDI fully automatically computed light attenuation, backscatter and light intensity for superficial and deep neointima. High light attenuation/backscatter and high light intensity are reportedly associated with lipidic change and tissue maturation, respectively. Superficial and deep neointima in BVS presented lower light attenuation than CoCr-EES (superficial: 0.77±0.15 vs. 1.27±0.55 mm-1, p<0.001; deep: 0.88±0.20 vs. 1.17±0.27 mm-1, p<0.001). Superficial neointima in BVS showed comparable backscatter to that of CoCr-EES (4.81±0.52 vs. 4.94±0.61, p=0.141), while deep neointima in BVS showed lower backscatter than that of CoCr-EES (4.60±0.62 vs. 4.97±0.62, p<0.001). Light intensity of superficial neointima was comparable between both arms (139±13 vs. 144±30, p=0.236), whereas light intensity of deep neointima in BVS was lower than CoCr-EES (129±14 vs. 138±21, p<0.001).The present OFDI comparison suggested that tissue maturation was comparable but lipidic change of neointima was less prominent after BVS than after CoCr-EES implantation.
Yohei Sotomi, Yoshinobu Onuma, Shengnan Liu, Taku Asano, Jeroen Eggermont, Yuki Katagiri, Rafael Cavalcante, Robbert J. de Winter, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Salvatore Brugaletta, Lorenz Räber, Manel Sabaté, Stephan Windecker, Jouke Dijkstra, Patrick W. Serruys (2018). Quality difference of neointima following the implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds and metallic stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative assessments by light intensity, light attenuation, and backscatter on optical coherence tomography in the TROFI II trial. EuroIntervention, 14(6), pp. 678-685, DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-17-00884.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2018
Authors
15
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
EuroIntervention
DOI
10.4244/eij-d-17-00884
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access