0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessScientific theories reflect some of humanity's greatest epistemic achievements. The best theories motivate us to search for discoveries, guide us towards successful interventions, and help us to explain and organize knowledge. Such theories require a high degree of specificity, and specifying them requires modeling skills. Unfortunately, in psychological science, theories are often not precise, and psychological scientists often lack the technical skills to formally specify existing theories. This problem raises the question: How can we promote formal theory development in psychology, where there are many content experts but few modelers? In this paper, we discuss one strategy for addressing this issue: a Many Modelers approach. Many Modelers consist of mixed teams of modelers and non-modelers that collaborate to create a formal theory of a phenomenon. We report a proof of concept of this approach, which we piloted as a three-hour hackathon at the SIPS 2021 conference. We find that (a) psychologists who have never developed a formal model can become excited about formal modeling and theorizing; (b) a division of labor in formal theorizing could be possible where only one or a few team members possess the prerequisite modeling expertise; and (c) first working prototypes of a theoretical model can be created in a short period of time.
Noah N'Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Adam Finnemann, Jill de Ron, Leonid Tiokhin, Shirley B. Wang, Johannes Algermissen, Elena C. Altmann, Li-Ching Chuang, Andrei Dumbravă, Štěpán Bahník, Jens Fuenderich, Sandra J. Geiger, Daria Gerasimova, Aidai Golan, Judith Herbers, Marc Jekel, Yih-Shiuan Lin, David Moreau, Yvonne Oberholzer, Hannah Katharina Peetz, Julia M. Rohrer, Adrian Rothers, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Yashvin Seetahul, Anna Szabelska, Natasha Tonge, Nicole Walasek, Marlene Werner, Denny Borsboom (2022). Practicing theory building in a many modelers hackathon: A proof of concept. , DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/r5yfz.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2022
Authors
29
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/r5yfz
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access