0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessA significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular.
Tatjana Potpara, Marek Grygier, Karl Georg Hæusler, Jens Erik Nielsen‐Kudsk, Sérgio Berti, Simonetta Genovesi, Éloi Marijon, Serge Bovéda, Apostolos Tzikas, Giuseppe Boriani, Lucas V.A. Boersma, Claudio Tondo, Tom De Potter, Professor Gregory Lip, Renate B. Schnabel, Rupert Bauersachs, Marco Senzolo, Carlo Basile, Stefano Bianchi, Pavel Osmančík, Boris Schmidt, Ulf Landmesser, Wolfram Doehner, Gerhard Hindricks, Jan Kovac, A. John Camm (2024). Practical Guide on Left Atrial Appendage Closure for the Non-implanting Physician. An International Consensus Paper. , 26(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae035.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2024
Authors
26
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae035
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access