0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free Access4001 Background: SOR is the only approved agent in uHCC and new options are needed. LEN, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1‒3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1‒4, platelet derived growth factor receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed activity in uHCC in a phase II trial. We report a phase III trial of LEN vs SOR as first-line therapy for uHCC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority (NI) study, pts had uHCC, ≥ 1 measurable target lesion, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Child-Pugh class A, ECOG PS ≤ 1, and no prior systemic therapy. Pts were randomized 1:1 to LEN (body weight ≥ 60 kg: 12 mg/day; < 60 kg: 8 mg/day) or SOR 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The OS hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% CI were estimated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. The predefined NI margin was 1.08. Secondary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR) by modified RECIST. Type I error rates for secondary efficacy endpoints were controlled with a fixed sequence procedure at 2-sided α = 0.05 after OS NI was claimed. Results: 954 Pts enrolled (LEN: 478; SOR: 476). Efficacy outcomes are shown in the table. A similar number of pts in both arms had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Most common LEN TEAEs were hypertension (42%), diarrhea (39%), decreased appetite (34%), decreased weight (31%), and fatigue (30%). Median (range) treatment duration was 5.7 mos (0−35.0) for LEN and 3.7 mos (0.1−38.7) for SOR. 13% Of LEN-treated and 9% of SOR-treated pts discontinued due to adverse events. 33% Of LEN-treated and 39% of SOR-treated pts received second-line therapy. Conclusions: LEN is noninferior in OS, and achieves statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS, TTP, and ORR, as first line therapy for uHCC. TEAEs were consistent with the known LEN safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01761266. [Table: see text]
Ann‐Lii Cheng, Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Kwang–Hyub Han, Kenji Ikeda, Fabio Piscaglia, Ari David Baron, Joong‐Won Park, Guohong Han, Jacek Jassem, Jean–Frédéric Blanc, Arndt Vogel, Д. В. Комов, T.R. Jeffry Evans, Carlos López, Corina E. Dutcus, Min Ren, Silvija Kraljevic, Toshiyuki Tamai, Masatoshi Kudo (2017). Phase III trial of lenvatinib (LEN) vs sorafenib (SOR) in first-line treatment of patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).. , 35(15_suppl), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.4001.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2017
Authors
20
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.4001
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access