Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in fresh cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2025

Particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in fresh cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2025
Vol 361
Vol. 361
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121518

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Carlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia

Institution not specified

Verified
Letizia Li Piani
Giovanna Esposito
Eva Negri
+8 more

Abstract

Several studies have assessed the relationship between exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ≤10 μm (PM10) and assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates, with controversial findings. This review aimed to consolidate the current evidence from fresh ART cycles and explore sources of heterogeneity across studies. The outcomes of interest were biochemical and clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Four exposure timeframes were considered: T0 (within 90 days before starting the stimulation protocol), T1 (from the first day of stimulation protocol to oocyte retrieval), T2 (from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer), and T3 (from embryo transfer to pregnancy). Database searches were conducted on PubMed/Medline and Embase up to April 2025, using a combination of MeSH/Emtree and generic terms relating to ART patients and air pollution exposure. Fourteen studies, involving 333,438 cycles, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were conducted between 2010 and 2024 primarily in China (10/14), while 3 were from the USA and one from Korea. We estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 for biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births, using random-effects meta-analytic models. The pooled RRs for 10 μg/m3 increment in PM2.5 and PM10 at T0 were respectively 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91–1.04) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.02) for biochemical pregnancy; for clinical pregnancy they were respectively 0.98 (95%CI: 0.96–1.01) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–1.00). All other findings were close to unity. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies for selected outcomes and exposure periods for both pollutants. This systematic review found no significant association between PM2.5 and PM10 exposure and ART outcomes after fresh embryo transfer for any of the four exposure windows.

How to cite this publication

Letizia Li Piani, Giovanna Esposito, Eva Negri, Irene La Vecchia, Vittoria Sterpi, Claudia Santucci, Rossella Bonzi, Carlo La Vecchia, Edgardo Somigliana, Paola Viganò, Fabio Parazzini (2025). Particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in fresh cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 361, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121518.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2025

Authors

11

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121518

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access