0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessRecent years have seen major developments in psychotherapy research that suggest the need to address critical methodological issues. These recommendations, developed by an international group of researchers, do not replace those for randomized controlled trials, but rather supplement strategies that need to be taken into account when considering psychological treatments. The limitations of traditional taxonomy and assessment methods are outlined, with suggestions for consideration of staging methods. Active psychotherapy control groups are recommended, and adaptive and dismantling study designs offer important opportunities. The treatments that are used, and particularly their specific ingredients, need to be described in detail for both the experimental and the control groups. Assessment should be performed blind before and after treatment and at long-term follow-up. A combination of observer- and self-rated measures is recommended. Side effects of psychotherapy should be evaluated using appropriate methods. Finally, the number of participants who deteriorate after treatment should be noted according to the methods that were used to define response or remission.
Jenny Guidi, Eva-Lotta Brakemeier, Claudi Bockting, Fiammetta Cosci, Pim Cuijpers, Robin B. Jarrett, Michael Linden, Isaac Marks, Charles Siegfried Peretti, Chiara Rafanelli, Winfried Rief, Silvia Schneider, Ulrich Schnyder, Tom Sensky, Elena Tomba, Carmelo Vázquez, Eduard Vieta, Stephan Zipfel, Jesse H. Wright, Giovanni A. Fava (2018). Methodological Recommendations for Trials of Psychological Interventions. , 87(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000490574.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2018
Authors
20
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000490574
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access