0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessMeta-analysis is commonly a core component of systematic reviews and has become an important method to reconcile conflicting findings, increase statistical power, and chart new research directions. However, poor reporting practices make it challenging to evaluate the validity of meta-analyses. Despite the existence of reporting checklists, a specifically designed tool has yet to be developed to appraise the completeness with which a meta-analysis has been reported. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Meta-analysis Appraisal Tool for Environmental Sciences (MATES). To develop MATES, we adapted a Delphi process involving experts in meta-analysis methodologies, researchers with experience in guideline/appraisal tool development, and editors of relevant journals. The Delphi process had five steps, including three workshops (11-16 participants), a survey (193 participants), and a validation task (30 participants). This iterative development process resulted in a 14-item appraisal tool that reflects the environmental science and research syntheses community's consensus on essential elements to appraise the completeness with which a meta-analysis has been reported. Validation across 50 meta-analyses demonstrated that the tool is repeatable (average agreement rate: 88.97 %) and time-efficient to implement (17.00 ± 12.23 min). We also outline guidance for interpreting MATES results, describe its potential applications, and reflect on the development process. The authors provide practical implementation guidance for each MATES item, illustrated with real examples in the supplementary material. We also report an extended development methodology to support reproducibility. Finally, we built created a ShinyApp that includes both a training module and an application tool to enhance the usability of MATES (https://kylemorrisonisshiny99.shinyapps.io/MATES_shiny/). Overall, MATES provides authors, readers, stakeholders, and editors with a reliable and accessible tool for appraising the completeness with which a meta-analysis in environmental sciences has been reported.
Kyle Morrison, Patrice Pottier, Pietro Pollo, Lorenzo Ricolfi, Coralie Williams, Yefeng Yang, Damien Beillouin, Simone Jaqueline Cardoso, Verónica Ferreira, Brian Gallagher, Guang Hao, Mojtaba Keikha, Betina Kozlowsky-Suzuki, T M Kiran Kumara, Francesco Latterini, Alexandro B. Leverkus, Erin L. Macartney, Silvina Magdalena Manrique, April Robin Martinig, Ayumi Mizuno, Shanika Nanayakkara, Evangelia Ntzani, Dakis-Yaoba Ouédraogo, Edward Pursell, Zachary Simpson, Harriet Sleight, Ziqian Xia, Mona Ghannad, Eliza Grames, Emily A. Hennessy, Joanna IntHout, David Moher, Rose E. O’Dea, Matthew J. Page, Paul Whaley, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa (2025). MATES: A tool for appraising the completeness with which a meta-analysis has been reported. , 207, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109935.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
37
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109935
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access