0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThis chapter presents new approaches for solving geotechnical engineering problems using classical tree-based genetic programming (TGP) and linear genetic programming (LGP). TGP and LGP are symbolic optimization techniques that create computer programs to solve a problem using the principle of Darwinian natural selection. Generally, they are supervised, machine-learning techniques that search a program space instead of a data space. Despite remarkable prediction capabilities of the TGP and LGP approaches, the contents of reported applications indicate that the progress in their development is marginal and not moving forward. The present study introduces a state-of-the-art examination of TGP and LGP applications in solving complex geotechnical engineering problems that are beyond the computational capability of traditional methods. In order to justify the capabilities of these techniques, they are systematically employed to formulate a typical geotechnical engineering problem. For this aim, effective angle of shearing resistance (ϕ′) of soils is formulated in terms of the physical properties of soil. The validation of the TGP and LGP models is verified using several statistical criteria. The numerical example shows the superb accuracy, efficiency, and great potential of TGP and LGP. The models obtained using TGP and LGP can be used efficiently as quick checks on solutions developed by more time consuming and in-depth deterministic analyses. The current research directions and issues that need further attention in the future are discussed.KeywordsTree-based genetic programming, linear genetic programming geotechnical engineering, prediction
Amir H. Alavi, Amir Gandomi, Ali Mollahasani, Jafar Bolouri Bazaz (2012). Linear and Tree-Based Genetic Programming for Solving Geotechnical Engineering ProblemsLinear and Tree-Based Genetic Programming for Solving Geotechnical Engineering Problems. Elsevier eBooks, pp. 289-310, DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-398296-4.00012-x,
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Chapter in a book
Year
2012
Authors
4
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-398296-4.00012-x
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access