Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2026

Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2026
DOI: 10.1177/1973798x261422970

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Carlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia

Institution not specified

Verified
Luisella Vigna
F. Gori
Silvia Budelli
+5 more

Abstract

Background Timely identification of lactose intolerance is crucial to prevent secondary complications. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three commonly used methods for detecting lactose malabsorption (LM): the lactose hydrogen breath test (LHBT), the lactose tolerance test (LTT), and the genetic test (GT). Methods Patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome underwent fasting and post-lactose (20 g) evaluations, including measurements of breath hydrogen, blood glucose, and genotyping for the C/T-13910 polymorphism associated with lactase persistence in European populations. A sustained increase of breath hydrogen ≥20 ppm above baseline, a failure of plasma glucose to rise >20 mg/dL from fasting levels, and the presence of the C/T-13910 variant were defined as positive for LHBT, LTT, and GT, respectively. Results One hundred and eight patients (age 39 ± 14 years, 17 males) were enrolled. Eighty-eight had symptoms after lactose ingestion. Of these, 88 (100%) were LHBT and 69 (78%) were LTT positive. Of a subgroup of 33 patients undergoing GT, 27 presented symptoms and 25 tested positive. Sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 85% for LHBT, 78% and 48% for LTT, and 93% and 83% for GT. Conclusions: With observation times greater than 4 h, LHBT had higher sensitivity and specificity than LTT and GT.

How to cite this publication

Luisella Vigna, F. Gori, Silvia Budelli, Alessandra Piontini, Laura Tomaino, Carlo La Vecchia, Raffaella Memmola, Paolo Marraccini (2026). Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1973798x261422970.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2026

Authors

8

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1177/1973798x261422970

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access