0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract The standard relationship between the dN/dS statistic and the selection coefficient is contingent upon the computation of the rate of fixation of non-synonymous and synonymous mutations among divergent lineages (substitutions). In cancer genomics, however, dN/dS is typically calculated by including mutations that are still segregating in the cell population. The interpretation of dN/dS within sexual populations has been shown to be problematic. Here we used a simple model of somatic evolution to study the relationship between dN/dS and the selection coefficient in the presence of deleterious, neutral, and beneficial mutations in cancer. We found that dN/dS can be used to distinguish cancer genes under positive or negative selection, but it is not always informative about the magnitude of the selection coefficient. In particular, under the asexual scenario simulated, dN/dS is insensitive to negative selection strength. Furthermore, the relationship between dN/dS and the positive selection coefficient depends on the mutation detection threshold, and, in particular scenarios, it can become non-linear. Our results warn about the necessary caution when interpreting the results drawn from dN/dS estimates in cancer.
Andrés Pérez‐Figueroa, David Posada (2021). Interpreting <i>dN/dS</i> under different selective regimes in cancer evolution. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.30.470556.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2021
Authors
2
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.30.470556
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access