0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract The 40Ar/39Ar dating method is among the most versatile of geochronometers, having the potential to date a broad variety of K-bearing materials spanning from the time of Earth’s formation into the historical realm. Measurements using modern noble-gas mass spectrometers are now producing 40Ar/39Ar dates with analytical uncertainties of ∼0.1%, thereby providing precise time constraints for a wide range of geologic and extraterrestrial processes. Analyses of increasingly smaller subsamples have revealed age dispersion in many materials, including some minerals used as neutron fluence monitors. Accordingly, interpretive strategies are evolving to address observed dispersion in dates from a single sample. Moreover, inferring a geologically meaningful “age” from a measured “date” or set of dates is dependent on the geological problem being addressed and the salient assumptions associated with each set of data. We highlight requirements for collateral information that will better constrain the interpretation of 40Ar/39Ar data sets, including those associated with single-crystal fusion analyses, incremental heating experiments, and in situ analyses of microsampled domains. To ensure the utility and viability of published results, we emphasize previous recommendations for reporting 40Ar/39Ar data and the related essential metadata, with the amendment that data conform to evolving standards of being findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) by both humans and computers. Our examples provide guidance for the presentation and interpretation of 40Ar/39Ar dates to maximize their interdisciplinary usage, reproducibility, and longevity.
Allen Schaen, Brian R. Jicha, K. V. Hodges, Pieter Vermeesch, Mark E. Stelten, C. M. Mercer, David Phillips, Tiffany Rivera, Fred Jourdan, Erin Matchan, Sidney R. Hemming, Leah E. Morgan, S. P. Kelley, William S. Cassata, M. T. Heizler, Paulo Vasconcelos, Jeffrey A. Benowitz, Anthony Koppers, Darren F. Mark, Elizabeth Niespolo, Courtney J. Sprain, Willis E. Hames, Klaudia F. Kuiper, B. D. Turrin, Paul Randall Renne, Jake Ross, Sébastien Nomade, Hervé Guillou, Laura E. Webb, B. A. Cohen, Andrew T. Calvert, Nancy Joyce, Morgan Ganerød, J.R. Wijbrans, Osamu Ishizuka, Huaiyu He, Adán Ramirez, Jörg A. Pfänder, Margarita López‐Martínez, Hua‐Ning Qiu, Brad S. Singer (2020). Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data. , 133(3-4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/b35560.1.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
41
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/b35560.1
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access