0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract : Previous studies have concluded that when making inferences, people tend to ignore various kinds of normatively important information (e.g., samples sizes, base rates). The basis for such conclusions has typically been the similarity of responses across groups presented with widely discrepant values of that information. The experiments reported here convert earlier, between- subject designs to within-subject formats. Each subject made several judgments as one kind of information varied across a range of possible values. When information regarding base rates and predictive validity was varied, roughly two-thirds of the subjects changed their judgments in directions dictated by normative considerations. There were no appreciable shifts in response to changes in sample size. Apparently, people know (or can figure out) sonewhat more than what they have been given credit for in the past. (Author)
Baruch Fischhoff, Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein (1978). Improving Intuitive Judgments BY Subjective Sensitivity Analysis. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ada058998.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Report
Year
1978
Authors
3
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21236/ada058998
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access