Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Impact of diabetes mellitus severity, treatment regimen and glycaemic control on atrial fibrillation prevalence. A report from the NOMED-AF prospective cross-sectional observational study

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2023

Impact of diabetes mellitus severity, treatment regimen and glycaemic control on atrial fibrillation prevalence. A report from the NOMED-AF prospective cross-sectional observational study

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2023
Vol 44 (Supplement_2)
Vol. 44
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.448

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Professor Gregory Lip
Professor Gregory Lip

University of Liverpool

Verified
Janusz Gumprecht
Professor Gregory Lip
Adam Sokal
+7 more

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the mechanism(s) by which DM affects AF prevalence remains unclear. The pathophysiological background underlying the frequent coexistence of diabetes and AF seems to be multifactorial, involving changes in left atrial size, abnormal proinflammatory mediators and endothelial dysfunction. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus severity, expressed as its known duration, antihyperglycemic treatment regimen and glycaemic control reflected by HbA1c level on AF and its silent, asymptomatic form (SAF) prevalence. Methods The cross-sectional NOMED-AF trial schedule comprised multistage, stratified and clustered population sampling with subsequent clinical evaluation and long-term non-invasive AF screening. AF was screened using a telemonitoring vest for a mean of 21.9± 9.1 days. From the representative sample of 3014 participants (mean age 77.5, 49.1% female), 881 participants (mean age 77.6 ± 0.25, 46.4% female) with concomitant DM were involved in the analysis. Results The mean DM duration was 12 ± 0.35 years, but no significant impact of DM timespan on AF and SAF prevalence was observed. There were also no differences in the course of DM treatment pattern (oral medication vs insulin vs both - oral + insulin) among the study population with and without concomitant AF (p=0.106). From the study population 72% (95% CI: 68.7-75.1) received only oral hypoglycaemic medication; 12.9% (95% CI: 10.7-15.5) was taking both oral treatment + insulin injections; and 15.1% (95% CI: 12.7-17.8) were administered with insulin only. Metabolic control reflected by HbA1c levels showed no significant association with AF prevalence (p=0.635; p=0.094). On multivariate analyses, age (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.35, 95%CI: 1.18-1.53, p<0.001), p=0.042), body mass index (BMI; OR 1.043, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08, p=0.027) and LDL<100 mg/dl (OR 0.64, 95%CI: 0.42-0.97, p=0.037) were independent risk factors for AF prevalence, while age (OR 1.45, 95%CI: 1.20-1.75, p<0.001), LDL<100 mg/dl (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.23-0.82, p=0.011), use of statins (OR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28-0.94, p=0.031) and HbA1c ≤6.5 (OR 0.46, 95%CI: 0.25-0.85, p=0.013) were associated with silent AF prevalence. Conclusions Diabetes duration, diabetic treatment pattern or metabolic control per se did not significantly impact the prevalence of AF, including silent AF detected by prospective continuous monitoring. Independent predictors of AF were age, BMI and low LDL levels, with statins and HbA1c ≤6.5 being additional independent predictors for SAF.

How to cite this publication

Janusz Gumprecht, Professor Gregory Lip, Adam Sokal, Beata Średniawa, Jakub Stokwiszewski, Tomasz Zdrojewski, Tomasz Grodzicki, Jarosław Kaźmierczak, Grzegorz Opolski, Zbigniew Kalarus (2023). Impact of diabetes mellitus severity, treatment regimen and glycaemic control on atrial fibrillation prevalence. A report from the NOMED-AF prospective cross-sectional observational study. , 44(Supplement_2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.448.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2023

Authors

10

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.448

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access