Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Preprint
en
2023

Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.28.534348dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.534348

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Dan Joseph Stein
Dan Joseph Stein

Institution not specified

Verified
Ziphozihle Ntwatwa
Christine Löchner
Annerine Roos
+19 more

Abstract

Abstract Intro Although it has been suggested that the hippocampus and amygdala (HA) are involved in the neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), volumetric findings have been inconsistent. Furthermore, the HA consist of heterogenous anatomic units with specific functions and cytoarchitecture, and little work has been undertaken on the volumetry of these subfields in OCD. Methods T1-weighted images from 381 patients with OCD and 338 healthy controls (HCs) from the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium were segmented to produce twelve hippocampal subfields and nine amygdala subfields using FreeSurfer 6.0. We assessed between-group differences in subfield volume using a mixed-effects model adjusted for age, quadratic effects of age, sex, site, and whole HA volume. Given evidence of confounding effects of clinical characteristics on brain volumes in OCD, we also performed subgroup analyses to examine subfield volume in relation to comorbid anxiety and depression, medication status, and symptom severity. Results Patients with OCD and HCs did not significantly differ in HA subfield volume. However, medicated patients with OCD had significantly smaller hippocampal dentate gyrus ( p FDR =0.042, d =-0.26) and molecular layer ( p FDR =0.042, d=-0.29) and larger lateral ( p FDR =0.049, d =0.23) and basal ( p FDR =0.049, d =0.25) amygdala subfields than HCs. Unmedicated patients had significantly smaller hippocampal CA1 (p FDR =0.016, d=-0.28) than HCs. No association was detected between any subfield volume and OCD severity. Conclusion Differences in HA subfields between OCD and HCs are dependent on medication status, in line with previous work on other brain volumetric alterations in OCD. This emphasizes the importance of considering psychotropic medication in neuroimaging studies of OCD.

How to cite this publication

Ziphozihle Ntwatwa, Christine Löchner, Annerine Roos, Tatum Sevenoaks, Jack van Honk, Pino Alonso, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Sunah Choi, Marcelo Q. Hoexter, Minah Kim, Jun Soo Kwon, David Mataix-Cols, José M. Menchón, Eurı́pedes Constantino Miguel, Takashi Nakamae, Mary L. Phillips, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Dick J. Veltman, Nynke A. Groenewold, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Dan Joseph Stein, Jonathan Ipser (2023). Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.534348.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Preprint

Year

2023

Authors

22

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.534348

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access