0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Background Umbrella reviews, or overviews of reviews, synthesize information using systematic reviews (SRs) as their unit of analysis. Although a formal guideline exists for reporting umbrella reviews of healthcare interventions (i.e. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews [PRIOR]), no formal guideline exists for conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies that examine epidemiological associations. Objective To review the existing guidance on conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies on epidemiological associations, as part of the process of developing a formal reporting guideline. Methods We reviewed the scoping review conducted in the context of PRIOR development and identified documents through forward citation search in PubMed, Scopus, and manual search in Google Scholar, Google Search up to December 22, 2024. Documents, regardless of format, were included if they provided guidance for conducting and/or reporting umbrella reviews of observational studies (including meta‐research studies of their features). Title/abstract screening and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate and summarized narratively by stages of the umbrella review process. Results The search retrieved 4491 unique records, with 96 full texts assessed and eight documents included. These documents, published between 2014 and 2023, offered guidance across seven topic areas, but overall guidance on conducting and/or reporting is limited. These areas include the answerable questions, prerequisite considerations, the scope of umbrella reviews, searching for SRs, primary data collection, analysis, presentation, and assessing the certainty/quality of the body of evidence. Conclusion There is a need for dedicated, practical, and evidence‐based formal reporting guidelines for umbrella reviews of observational studies on epidemiological associations. This review lays the groundwork for developing the PRIOR‐extension for such studies: the Preferred Reporting Items for Umbrella Reviews of Cross‐sectional, Case‐control, and Cohort Studies.
Carl Zhou, Nicholas Fabiano, Arnav Gupta, Stanley Wong, Kelly D. Cobey, David Moher, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Jeremy Y. Ng, Elena Dragioti, Jae Il Shin, Joaquim Raduà, Samuele Cortese, Beverley Shea, Nicola Veronese, Lisa Hartling, Michelle Pollock, Stefania Papatheodorou, John P A Ioannidis, Marco Solmi (2025). Guidance for umbrella reviews of observational studies: A scoping review. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70017.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2025
Authors
19
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70017
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access