0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling Cross-cutting Group (Soil CN group) of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse gases (GRA) promotes a coordinated activity across multiple international projects (e.g. CN MIP and Models4Pastures of the FACCE-JPI https://www.faccejpi.com) to benchmark and compare simulation models that simulate GHG emissions from arable crop and grassland systems. Ten long-term experimental sites are studied covering a variety of climatic and geographic conditions worldwide (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, India, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States). Twenty-four process-based models of different complexity have contributed to the modelling exercise in different stages, each with access to gradually more detailed data to run and evaluate models of a multi-stage protocol. We present a comparison of model estimates of production (e.g. grain yield, gross primary production, above-ground net primary production, grassland grazing or defoliation) and vegetation (e.g. leaf area index) outputs, as well as GHG emissions (e.g. ecosystem respiration, nitrous oxide, enteric methane) from individual models to the multi-model ensemble. We found substantial discrepancies across different models, indicating considerable uncertainties regarding the simulation of crop and grassland processes. We show that uncertainties are considerably reduced after calibration with detailed production and phenology data. The multi-model approach also allowed for improved performance, according to relative root mean square error and relative bias performance metrics. Calibrated models provide a reliable basis for testing mitigation options at the studied sites.
Renáta Sándor, Fiona Ehrhardt, Bruno Basso, Arti Bathia, Gianni Bellocchi, Lorenzo Brilli, L. M. Cardenas, Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati, J.D. Bregon, Christopher D. Dorich, Lucas Doro, Nuala Fitton, Sandro José Giacomini, Peter Grace, Brian Grant, Matthew Tom Harrison, Stephanie Jones, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Katja Klumpp, Patricia Laville, Joël Léonard, Mark A. Liebig, Mark Lieffering, Raphaël Martin, Russel McAuliffe, Elizabeth A. Meier, Lutz Merbold, Andrew D. Moore, Vasilis Myrgiotis, Elizabeth Pattey, Q. Zhang, Sylvie Recous, Suzanne Rolinski, Joanna Sharp, Raia Silvia Massad, Pete Smith, Ward Smith, Val Snow, Jean‐François Soussana (2016). Global research alliance on agricultural greenhouse gases - benchmark and ensemble crop and grassland model estimates.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2016
Authors
39
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access