0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessOver a 24-year period, garbage codes were used in 29.0% of all deaths. The most important determinants of a death to be assigned a garbage code were advanced age and place of death outside hospital. Knowledge of the national epidemiological situation, as well as the rules and guidelines for mortality coding, is essential for understanding the prevalence and distribution of garbage codes, in order to rely on vital statistics.
Christian Lycke Ellingsen, G. Cecilie Alfsen, Marta Ebbing, Anne Pedersen, Gerhard Sulo, Dan Joseph Stein, Geir Sverre Braut (2022). Garbage codes in the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry 1996–2019. , 22(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13693-w.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2022
Authors
7
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13693-w
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
