0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe incorporation of renewable and sustainable energy sources in electric grids has been acknowledged as a potential strategy to solve the ever-growing environmental issues that result from the use of fossil fuels. In order to realize the full potential of these systems, advanced electrochemical energy storage devices must be developed. Recently, researchers have turned their attention toward obtaining high-performance electrode nanomaterials in order to develop these next-generation electrochemical systems. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), well-known for their relatively straightforward fabrication methods, high nanoscale porosities, robust nanostructures, and intrinsic crystallinities, have emerged as a class of nanomaterials potentially capable of meeting the stringent demands for these systems. Specifically, bridged MOFs and other MOF derivatives have recently been established as the primary MOF-based nanomaterials in studies on electrochemical systems, such as batteries and capacitors, as these nanomaterials have demonstrated the potential to address the poor conductivities that arise from separated nanoparticles in early reports on MOF-only systems. As such, we have focused this review on these nanomaterials, and in particular, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of electrochemical systems with a range of support materials, including carbon nanotubes, carbon fibers, graphene, metals, metal oxides, and conductive polymers. Finally, we highlight the remaining challenges and the possible opportunities for research in this field in order to facilitate future studies.
Kaiqiang Zhang, Kent O. Kirlikovali, Quyet Van Le, Zhong Jin, Rajender S. Varma, Ho Won Jang, Omar K. Farha, Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr (2020). Extended Metal–Organic Frameworks on Diverse Supports as Electrode Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Storage. , 3(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c00702.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
8
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c00702
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access