Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Evaluation of the <scp>ECOSSE</scp> model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2017

Evaluation of the <scp>ECOSSE</scp> model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2017
Vol 68 (3)
Vol. 68
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12416

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Pete Smith
Pete Smith

University of Aberdeen

Verified
Marta Dondini
Giorgio Alberti
Gemini Delle Vedove
+10 more

Abstract

Summary This paper aims to evaluate the suitability of the ECOSSE model to estimate soil heterotrophic respiration ( R h ) from arable land and short rotation coppices of poplar and willow. Between 2011 and 2013, we measured R h with automatic closed dynamic chambers on root exclusion plots at one site in the UK (willow, mixed commercial genotypes of S alix spp.) and two sites in I taly (arable and poplar, P opulus × C anadensis M oench, O udemberg genotype), and compared these measured fluxes to simulated values of R h with the ECOSSE model. Correlation coefficients ( r ) between modelled and measured monthly R h data were strong and significant, with a range between 0.81 and 0.96 for all three types of vegetation. There was no significant error and bias in the model for any site. The model was able to predict seasonal trends in R h at all three sites even though it occasionally underestimated the flux values during warm weather in spring and summer. Because of the strong correlation between the measured and modelled values, it is unlikely that underestimation of the flux is the result of missing processes in the model. Therefore, further detailed monitoring of R h is needed to modify the model. In this research, a limited set of input data was used to simulate R h at the three sites. Nevertheless, overall results of the model evaluation suggest that the ECOSSE model simulates soil R h adequately under all land uses tested and that continuous and direct measurements (such as automatic chambers installed on root‐exclusion plots) are a useful tool to test model performance to simulate R h at the site level. Highlights Model evaluation is crucial to predict soil carbon balance accurately. Modelled and measured heterotrophic respiration were compared for three land uses. The model performed well statistically for all three vegetation types. Modelled heterotrophic respiration should be evaluated by comparison to continuous measurements.

How to cite this publication

Marta Dondini, Giorgio Alberti, Gemini Delle Vedove, Maurizio Ventura, Giustino Tonon, Maud Viger, Zoe M. Harris, Joseph R. Jenkins, Mark Richards, Mark Pogson, Gail Taylor, Jo Smith, Pete Smith (2017). Evaluation of the <scp>ECOSSE</scp> model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements. , 68(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12416.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2017

Authors

13

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12416

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access