0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessSummary This paper aims to evaluate the suitability of the ECOSSE model to estimate soil heterotrophic respiration ( R h ) from arable land and short rotation coppices of poplar and willow. Between 2011 and 2013, we measured R h with automatic closed dynamic chambers on root exclusion plots at one site in the UK (willow, mixed commercial genotypes of S alix spp.) and two sites in I taly (arable and poplar, P opulus × C anadensis M oench, O udemberg genotype), and compared these measured fluxes to simulated values of R h with the ECOSSE model. Correlation coefficients ( r ) between modelled and measured monthly R h data were strong and significant, with a range between 0.81 and 0.96 for all three types of vegetation. There was no significant error and bias in the model for any site. The model was able to predict seasonal trends in R h at all three sites even though it occasionally underestimated the flux values during warm weather in spring and summer. Because of the strong correlation between the measured and modelled values, it is unlikely that underestimation of the flux is the result of missing processes in the model. Therefore, further detailed monitoring of R h is needed to modify the model. In this research, a limited set of input data was used to simulate R h at the three sites. Nevertheless, overall results of the model evaluation suggest that the ECOSSE model simulates soil R h adequately under all land uses tested and that continuous and direct measurements (such as automatic chambers installed on root‐exclusion plots) are a useful tool to test model performance to simulate R h at the site level. Highlights Model evaluation is crucial to predict soil carbon balance accurately. Modelled and measured heterotrophic respiration were compared for three land uses. The model performed well statistically for all three vegetation types. Modelled heterotrophic respiration should be evaluated by comparison to continuous measurements.
Marta Dondini, Giorgio Alberti, Gemini Delle Vedove, Maurizio Ventura, Giustino Tonon, Maud Viger, Zoe M. Harris, Joseph R. Jenkins, Mark Richards, Mark Pogson, Gail Taylor, Jo Smith, Pete Smith (2017). Evaluation of the <scp>ECOSSE</scp> model to predict heterotrophic soil respiration by direct measurements. , 68(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12416.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2017
Authors
13
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12416
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access