0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessGrowing environmental pollution worldwide is mostly caused by the accumulation of different types of liquid and solid wastes. Therefore, policies in developed countries seek to support the concept of waste recycling due to its significant impact on the environmental footprint. Hot-mix asphalt mixtures (HMA) with reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) have shown great performance under rutting. However, incorporating a high percentage of RAP (>25%) is a challenging issue due to the increased stiffness of the resulting mixture. The stiffness problem is resolved by employing different types of commercial and noncommercial rejuvenators. In this study, three types of noncommercial rejuvenators (waste cooking oil (WCO), waste engine oil (WEO), and date seed oil (DSO)) were used, in addition to one type of commercial rejuvenator. Three percentages of RAP (20%, 40%, and 60%) were utilized. Mixing proportions for the noncommercial additives were set as 0−10% for mixtures with 20% RAP, 12.5−17.5% for mixtures with 40% RAP, and 17.5−20% for mixtures with 60% RAP. In addition, mixing proportions for the commercial additive were set as 0.5−1.0% for mixtures with 20% RAP, 1.0−1.5% for mixtures with 40% RAP, and 1.5−2.0% for mixtures with 60% RAP. The rutting performance of the generated mixtures was indicated first by using the rutting index (G*/sin δ) for the combined binders and then evaluated using the Hamburg wheel-track test. The results showed that the rejuvenated mixtures with the commercial additive at 20 and 60% RAP performed well compared to the control mixture, whereas the rejuvenated ones at 40% RAP performed well with noncommercial additives in comparison to the control mixture. Furthermore, the optimum percentages for each type of the used additives were obtained, depending on their respective performance, as 10%, 12.5%, and 17.5% of WCO, 10%, 12.5−17.5%, and 17.5% of WEO, <10%, 12.5%, and 17.5% of DSO, and 0.5−1.0%, 1.0%, and 1.5−2.0% of the commercial rejuvenator, corresponding to the three adopted percentages of RAP.
Tameem Mohammed Hashim, Mohammed Salah Nasr, Yasir Mohammed Jebur, Abdullah Kadhim, Zainab Al-Khafaji, Mirza Ghouse Baig, Saheed Kolawole Adekunle, Mohammed Al-osta, Shamsad Ahmad, Zaher Mundher Yaseen (2022). Evaluating Rutting Resistance of Rejuvenated Recycled Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures Using Different Types of Recycling Agents. Materials, 15(24), pp. 8769-8769, DOI: 10.3390/ma15248769.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2022
Authors
10
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Materials
DOI
10.3390/ma15248769
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access