0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessTo predict the response of C-rich soils to external change, models are needed that accurately \nreflect the conditions of these soils. Estimation of Carbon in Organic Soils—Sequestration and \nEmissions (ECOSSE) is a model that allows simulations of soil C and N turnover in both mineral and \norganic soils using only the limited meteorological, land-use and soil data that is available at the \nnational scale. Because it is able to function at field as well as national scales if appropriate input data \nare used, field-scale evaluations can be used to determine uncertainty in national simulations. Here \nwe present an evaluation of the uncertainty expected in national-scale simulations of Scotland, using \ndata from the National Soil Inventory of Scotland. This data set provides measurements of C change \nfor the range of soils, climates and land-use types found across Scotland. The simulated values show \na high degree of association with the measurements in both total C and change in C content of the \nsoil. Over all sites where land-use change occurred, the average deviation between the simulated \nand measured values of percentage change in soil C was less than the experimental error (11% simulation \nerror, 53% measurement error). This suggests that the uncertainty in the national-scale simulations \nwill be ~11%. Only a small bias in the simulations was observed compared to the measured \nvalues, suggesting that a small underestimate of the change in soil C should be expected at the \nnational scale (–4%)
Jo Smith, Pia Gottschalk, Jessica Bellarby, Stephen J. Chapman, Allan Lilly, W. Towers, J. Simon Bell, Kevin Coleman, Dali Nayak, Mark Richards, Jon Hillier, Helen Flynn, M. Wattenbach, Matt Aitkenhead, Jagadeesh Yeluripati, John G. Farmer, R. Milne, A. M. Thomson, Chris Evans, A. P. Whitmore, Pete Falloon, Pete Smith (2010). Estimating changes in Scottish soil carbon stocks using ECOSSE. I. Model description and uncertainties. , 45, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00899.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2010
Authors
22
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00899
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access