0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Simulation models represent soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in global carbon (C) cycle scenarios to support climate‐change studies. It is imperative to increase confidence in long‐term predictions of SOC dynamics by reducing the uncertainty in model estimates. We evaluated SOC simulated from an ensemble of 26 process‐based C models by comparing simulations to experimental data from seven long‐term bare‐fallow (vegetation‐free) plots at six sites: Denmark (two sites), France, Russia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The decay of SOC in these plots has been monitored for decades since the last inputs of plant material, providing the opportunity to test decomposition without the continuous input of new organic material. The models were run independently over multi‐year simulation periods (from 28 to 80 years) in a blind test with no calibration (Bln) and with the following three calibration scenarios, each providing different levels of information and/or allowing different levels of model fitting: (a) calibrating decomposition parameters separately at each experimental site (Spe); (b) using a generic, knowledge‐based, parameterization applicable in the Central European region (Gen); and (c) using a combination of both (a) and (b) strategies (Mix). We addressed uncertainties from different modelling approaches with or without spin‐up initialization of SOC. Changes in the multi‐model median (MMM) of SOC were used as descriptors of the ensemble performance. On average across sites, Gen proved adequate in describing changes in SOC, with MMM equal to average SOC (and standard deviation) of 39.2 (±15.5) Mg C/ha compared to the observed mean of 36.0 (±19.7) Mg C/ha (last observed year), indicating sufficiently reliable SOC estimates. Moving to Mix (37.5 ± 16.7 Mg C/ha) and Spe (36.8 ± 19.8 Mg C/ha) provided only marginal gains in accuracy, but modellers would need to apply more knowledge and a greater calibration effort than in Gen, thereby limiting the wider applicability of models.
Roberta Farina, Renáta Sándor, Mohamed Abdalla, Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, Luca Bechini, Martin A. Bolinder, Lorenzo Brilli, Claire Chenu, Hugues Clivot, Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati, Claudia Di Bene, Christopher D. Dorich, Fiona Ehrhardt, Fabien Ferchaud, Nuala Fitton, Rosa Francaviglia, Uwe Franko, Donna Giltrap, Brian Grant, Bertrand Guenet, Matthew Tom Harrison, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Katrin Kuka, Liisa Kulmala, Jari Liski, Matthew J. McGrath, Elizabeth A. Meier, Lorenzo Menichetti, Fernando Moyano, Claas Nendel, Sylvie Recous, Nils Reibold, A. Shepherd, Ward Smith, Pete Smith, Jean‐François Soussana, Tommaso Stella, Arezoo Taghizadeh‐Toosi, Elena Tsutskikh, Gianni Bellocchi (2020). Ensemble modelling, uncertainty and robust predictions of organic carbon in long‐term bare‐fallow soils. , 27(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15441.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
40
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15441
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access