Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
2019

Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
2019
The Lancet
Vol 393 (10190)
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30474-x

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys

Imperial College London

Verified
Raffaele Piccolo
Kaare Harald Bønaa
Orestis Efthimiou
+49 more

Abstract

Background New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have mostly been investigated in head-to-head non-inferiority trials against early-generation DES and have typically shown similar efficacy and superior safety. How the safety profile of new-generation DES compares with that of bare-metal stents (BMS) is less clear. Methods We did an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials to compare outcomes after implantation of new-generation DES or BMS among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Data were pooled in a one-stage random-effects meta-analysis and examined at maximum follow-up and a 1-year landmark. Risk estimates are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. This study is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42017060520. Findings We obtained individual data for 26 616 patients in 20 randomised trials. Mean follow-up was 3·2 (SD 1·8) years. The risk of the primary outcome was reduced in DES recipients compared with BMS recipients (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·78–0·90, p<0·001) owing to a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (0·79, 0·71–0·88, p<0·001) and a possible slight but non-significant cardiac mortality benefit (0·89, 0·78–1·01, p=0·075). All-cause death was unaffected (HR with DES 0·96, 95% CI 0·88–1·05, p=0·358), but risk was lowered for definite stent thrombosis (0·63, 0·50–0·80, p<0·001) and target-vessel revascularisation (0·55, 0·50–0·60, p<0·001). We saw a time-dependent treatment effect, with DES being associated with lower risk of the primary outcome than BMS up to 1 year after placement. While the effect was maintained in the longer term, there was no further divergence from BMS after 1 year. Interpretation The performance of new-generation DES in the first year after implantation means that BMS should no longer be considered the gold standard for safety. Further development of DES technology should target improvements in clinical outcomes beyond 1 year. Funding Bern University Hospital.

How to cite this publication

Raffaele Piccolo, Kaare Harald Bønaa, Orestis Efthimiou, Olivier Varenne, Andrea Baldo, Philip Urban, Christoph Kaiser, Wouter Remkes, Lorenz Räber, Adam de Belder, Arnoud W.J. van ‘t Hof, Goran Stanković, Pedro A. Lemos, Tom Wilsgaard, Jörg Reifart, Alfredo E. Rodríguez, Expedito E. Ribeiro, Patrick W. Serruys, Alexandre Abizaid, Manel Sabaté, Robert A. Byrne, José M. de la Torre Hernández, William Wijns, Peter Jüni, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli, Raffaele Piccolo, Kaare Harald Bønaa, Orestis Efthimiou, Olivier Varenne, Andrea Baldo, Philip Urban, Christoph Kaiser, Wouter Remkes, Lorenz Räber, Adam de Belder, Arnoud W.J. van ‘t Hof, Goran Stanković, Pedro A. Lemos, Tom Wilsgaard, Jörg Reifart, Alfredo E. Rodríguez, Expedito E. Ribeiro, Patrick W. Serruys, Alexandre Abizaid, Manel Sabaté, Robert A. Byrne, José M. de la Torre Hernández, William Wijns, Peter Jüni, Stephan Windecker, Marco Valgimigli (2019). Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. The Lancet, 393(10190), pp. 2503-2510, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30474-x.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2019

Authors

52

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

The Lancet

DOI

10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30474-x

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access