0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessSummary Using data from 1721 participants in a community‐based randomized control trial of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia compared with patient education, we employed linear mixed modelling analyses to examine whether chronotype moderated the benefits of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on self‐reported levels of insomnia severity, fatigue and psychological distress. Baseline self‐ratings on the reduced version of the Horne–Östberg Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire were used to categorize the sample into three chronotypes: morning type ( n = 345; 20%); intermediate type ( n = 843; 49%); and evening type ( n = 524; 30%). Insomnia Severity Index, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were assessed pre‐ and post‐intervention (9 weeks). For individuals with self‐reported morning or intermediate chronotypes, digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia was superior to patient education on all ratings (Insomnia Severity Index, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at follow‐up ( p ‐values ≤ 0.05). For individuals with self‐reported evening chronotype, digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia was superior to patient education for Insomnia Severity Index and Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, but not on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( p = 0.139). There were significant differences in the treatment effects between the three chronotypes on the Insomnia Severity Index ( p = 0.023) estimated difference between evening and morning type of −1.70, 95% confidence interval: −2.96 to −0.45, p = 0.008, and estimated difference between evening and intermediate type −1.53, 95% confidence interval: −3.04 to −0.03, p = 0.046. There were no significant differences in the treatment effects between the three chronotypes on the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire ( p = 0.488) or the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( p = 0.536). We conclude that self‐reported chronotype moderates the effects of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on insomnia severity, but not on psychological distress or fatigue.
Patrick Faaland, Øystein Vedaa, Knut Langsrud, Børge Sivertsen, Stian Lydersen, Cecilie L. Vestergaard, Kaia Kjørstad, Daniel Vethe, Lee M. Ritterband, Allison G Harvey, Tore C. Stiles, Jan Scott, Håvard Kallestad (2022). Digital cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (dCBT‐I): Chronotype moderation on intervention outcomes. , 31(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13572.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2022
Authors
13
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13572
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access