0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessLi-NASICON solid-state superionic conductors have traditionally been regarded as promising candidates for Li-air applications because of their stability in ambient air and water [1], [2] . However, the presence of water in the cathode can change the discharge product from Li 2 O 2 to LiOH [3], [4] , inducing a highly alkaline environment which may degrade cathode and separator materials. Here, we investigate the impact of octahedral substitution on the alkaline stability of common Li-NASICON chemistries through a systematic experimental case study of LiTi x Ge 2-x (PO 4 ) 3 (LTGP) with varying x = 0 - 2.0. Density functional theory calculations are combined to gain mechanistic understandings of the alkaline instability. We demonstrated that the alkaline instability of LTGP is mainly driven by the dissolution of PO 4 polyanion groups, which subsequently precipitate as Li 3 PO 4 . The introduction of Ti facilitates the formation of a Ti-rich compound on the surface that eventually passivates the material, but only after significant bulk degradation. Consequently, phosphate-based Li-NASICON materials exhibit limited alkaline stability, raising concerns of their viability in humid Li-air batteries. [1] N. Imanishi, S. Hasegawa, T. Zhang, A. Hirano, Y. Takeda, and O. Yamamoto, “Lithium anode for lithium-air secondary batteries,” Journal of Power Sources , vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 1392–1397, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.080. [2] R. Chen, Q. Li, X. Yu, L. Chen, and H. Li, “Approaching Practically Accessible Solid-State Batteries: Stability Issues Related to Solid Electrolytes and Interfaces,” Chem. Rev. , vol. 120, no. 14, pp. 6820–6877, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268. [3] S. Ma, J. Wang, J. Huang, Z. Zhou, and Z. Peng, “Unveiling the Complex Effects of H2O on Discharge–Recharge Behaviors of Aprotic Lithium–O2 Batteries,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3333–3339, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01333. [4] T. Liu et al. , “Cycling Li-O2 batteries via LiOH formation and decomposition,” Science , vol. 350, no. 6260, pp. 530–533, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.aac7730.
Benjamin X. Lam, Zhuohan Li, Gerbrand Ceder (2024). Degradation Mechanism of Phosphate-Based Li-Nasicon Conductors in Alkaline Environment. , MA2024-02(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2024-0281129mtgabs.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2024
Authors
3
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2024-0281129mtgabs
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access