0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessA questionnaire with items that had been used in a national survey of the general public was administered to persons attending an American Nuclear Society meeting. The items asked about risks associated with high‐level nuclear waste (HLNW), trust in nuclear‐waste program managers, costs and benefits of a repository project, and images of a HLNW repository. The results suggest that nuclear industry experts may have very different opinions from the general public about most of these items and their images of a repository indicate a vastly different conceptual framework within which their opinions are formed.
James Flynn, Paul Slovic, C. K. Mertz (1993). Decidedly Different: Expert and Public Views of Risks from a Radioactive Waste Repository. Risk Analysis, 13(6), pp. 643-648, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01326.x.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
1993
Authors
3
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
English
Journal
Risk Analysis
DOI
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01326.x
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
