0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became binding law in the European Union Member States in 2018, as a step toward harmonizing personal data protection legislation in the European Union. The Regulation governs almost all types of personal data processing, hence, also, those pertaining to biomedical research. The purpose of this article is to highlight the main practical issues related to data and biological sample sharing that biomedical researchers face regularly, and to specify how these are addressed in the context of GDPR, after consulting with ethics/legal experts. We identify areas in which clarifications of the GDPR are needed, particularly those related to consent requirements by study participants. Amendments should target the following: (1) restricting exceptions based on national laws and increasing harmonization, (2) confirming the concept of broad consent, and (3) defining a roadmap for secondary use of data. These changes will be achieved by acknowledged learned societies in the field taking the lead in preparing a document giving guidance for the optimal interpretation of the GDPR, which will be finalized following a period of commenting by a broad multistakeholder audience. In parallel, promoting engagement and education of the public in the relevant issues (such as different consent types or residual risk for re-identification), on both local/national and international levels, is considered critical for advancement. We hope that this article will open this broad discussion involving all major stakeholders, toward optimizing the GDPR and allowing a harmonized transnational research approach.
Antonia Vlahou, Dara Hallinan, Rolf Apweiler, Àngel Argilés, Joachim Beige, Ariela Benigni, Rainer Bischoff, Peter C. Black, Franziska Boehm, Jocelyn Céraline, George Chrousos, Christian Delles, Pieter Evenepoel, Ivo Fridolin, Griet Glorieux, Alain J. van Gool, Isabel Heidegger, John P. A. Ioannidis, Joachim Jankowski, Vera Jankowski, Cármen Jerónimo, Ashish M. Kamat, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Gert Mayer, Harald Mischak, Alberto Ortíz, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Peter Rossing, Joost P. Schanstra, Bernd J. Schmitz‐Dräger, Goce Spasovski, Jan A. Staessen, Dimitrios Stamatialis, Peter Stenvinkel, Christoph Wanner, Stephen B. Williams, Faı̈ez Zannad, Carmine Zoccali, Raymond Vanholder (2021). Data Sharing Under the General Data Protection Regulation. , 77(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16340.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2021
Authors
39
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16340
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access