Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) Alone in Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Updated Analysis of the Phase 3 Alcyone Study

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
en
2022

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) Alone in Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Updated Analysis of the Phase 3 Alcyone Study

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2022
Vol 140 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 140
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-163347

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Meletios A Dimopoulos
Meletios A Dimopoulos

Institution not specified

Verified
María‐Victoria Mateos
Jesús F. San Miguel
Michèle Cavo
+22 more

Abstract

Introduction: Daratumumab (DARA) is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 with a direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanism of action. DARA is approved across multiple lines of therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. In the primary analysis of the phase 3 ALCYONE study (median follow-up, 16.5 months), a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was achieved with D-VMP versus VMP alone (median not reached vs 18.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.65; P <0.001) in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM, with no increase in overall toxicity (Mateos MV, N Engl J Med 2018). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 40.1 months), D-VMP significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to VMP alone (median not reached in either arm; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46-0.80; P = 0.0003). The rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was also higher with D-VMP versus VMP (28% versus 7%; P <0.0001; Mateos MV, Lancet 2020). Here, we present an updated analysis of ALCYONE after a median follow-up of 74.7 months. Methods: Patients with NDMM ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant were randomized 1:1 to receive VMP ± DARA. Randomization was stratified by International Staging System disease stage (I vs II vs III), region (Europe vs other), and age (<75 vs ≥75 years). All patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of VMP (V: 1.3 mg/m2 SC on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 of Cycle 1 and Days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of Cycles 2-9; M: 9 mg/m2 PO on Days 1-4 of Cycles 1-9; P: 60 mg/m2 PO on Days 1-4 of Cycles 1-9) ± DARA (16 mg/kg IV given once weekly in Cycle 1, once every 3 weeks in Cycles 2-9, and once every 4 weeks in Cycles 10+ until disease progression). OS, MRD-negativity rate (10-5 sensitivity: clonoSEQ® version 2.0), and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: In total, 706 patients were randomized (D-VMP, n = 350; VMP, n = 356). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. After a median follow-up of 74.7 months, a 37% reduction in the risk of death was observed with D-VMP versus VMP; median OS was 82.7 months with D-VMP versus 53.6 months with VMP (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78; P <0.0001). The estimated 72-month OS rate was 55.8% with D-VMP versus 39.2% with VMP (Figure A). The observed OS benefit of D-VMP versus VMP alone was generally consistent across pre-specified patient subgroups (Figure B). The MRD-negativity rate was higher for D-VMP versus VMP (28.3% vs 7.0%; P <0.0001), as was the rate of sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥12 months (14.0% vs 2.8%; P <0.0001). The most common (occurring in ≥30% of patients in either arm) any grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; D-VMP/VMP) were neutropenia (50.6%/52.5%), thrombocytopenia (50.0%/53.7%), anemia (32.4%/37.0%), upper respiratory tract infection (30.9%/14.1%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (28.9%/34.5%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 82.9% of D-VMP patients and 77.4% of VMP patients, with the most common (occurring in ≥15% of patients in either arm) being neutropenia (D-VMP/VMP; 40.2%/39.0%), thrombocytopenia (34.7%/37.9%), anemia (18.2%/19.8%), and pneumonia (15.6%/4.5%). Grade 3/4 infection rates were 29.8%/15.0%. Conclusions: In this updated analysis of ALCYONE, the addition of DARA to VMP continued to prolong OS versus VMP alone in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM; median OS was reached in both arms for the first time after a median follow-up of >6 years. D-VMP also achieved a 4-fold higher MRD-negativity rate and a 5-fold higher ≥12-month sustained MRD-negativity rate versus VMP alone. No new safety concerns were observed with longer follow-up. Our results continue to support the use of D-VMP in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Updated OS results based on extended follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

How to cite this publication

María‐Victoria Mateos, Jesús F. San Miguel, Michèle Cavo, Joan Bladé Creixenti, Kenshi Suzuki, Andrzej Jakubowiak, Stefan Knop, Chantal Doyen, Paulo Lúcio, Zsolt Nagy, Luděk Pour, Sebastian Grosicki, Andre H Crepaldi, Anna Marina Liberati, Philip Campbell, Tatiana Shelekhova, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Genadi Iosava, Tomoaki Fujisaki, Mamta Garg, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Meletios A Dimopoulos (2022). Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) Alone in Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Updated Analysis of the Phase 3 Alcyone Study. , 140(Supplement 1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-163347.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

2022

Authors

25

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-163347

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access