Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Comparison of Imipenem and Ceftazidime as Therapy for Severe Melioidosis

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Article
English
1999

Comparison of Imipenem and Ceftazidime as Therapy for Severe Melioidosis

0 Datasets

0 Files

English
1999
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Vol 29 (2)
DOI: 10.1086/520219

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Sir Nicholas White
Sir Nicholas White

University Of Cambridge

Verified
Andrew J. H. Simpson
Yupin Suputtamongkol
Michael D. Smith
+7 more

Abstract

An open, prospective, randomized, comparative treatment trial was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose intravenous imipenem and ceftazidime for acute severe melioidosis. Adult Thai patients with suspected acute, severe melioidosis were randomized to receive either imipenem, at a dosage of 50 mg/(kg z d), or ceftazidime, at a dosage of 120 mg/(kg z d), for a minimum of 10 days. The main outcome measures were death or treatment failure. Of the 296 patients enrolled, 214 had culture-confirmed melioidosis, and 132 (61.7%) of them had positive blood cultures. Mortality among patients with melioidosis was 36.9% overall. There were no differences in survival overall (P = .96) or after 48 hours (P = .3). Treatment failure after 48 hours was more common among patients treated with ceftazidime (P = .011). Both treatments were well tolerated. Imipenem is a safe and effective treatment for acute severe melioidosis and may be considered an alternative to ceftazidime.

How to cite this publication

Andrew J. H. Simpson, Yupin Suputtamongkol, Michael D. Smith, Brian Angus, Adul Rajanuwong, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Paul A. Howe, Amanda L. Walsh, Wipada Chaowagul, Sir Nicholas White (1999). Comparison of Imipenem and Ceftazidime as Therapy for Severe Melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 29(2), pp. 381-387, DOI: 10.1086/520219.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Article

Year

1999

Authors

10

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

English

Journal

Clinical Infectious Diseases

DOI

10.1086/520219

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access