0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAlthough there was a significant correlation between NL and NP values as well as with clinical examination of the PLR, the 2 devices were not always interchangeable, especially for the evaluation of pupillary latency.
Chiara Robba, Bedrana Moro Salihovic, Selene Pozzebon, Jacques Créteur, Mauro Oddo, Jean Louis Vincent, Fabio Silvio Taccone (2019). Comparison of 2 Automated Pupillometry Devices in Critically III Patients. , 32(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ana.0000000000000604.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2019
Authors
7
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ana.0000000000000604
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
