0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessSince a noisy image has inferior characteristics, the direct use of Fuzzy C -Means (FCM) to segment it often produces poor image segmentation results. Intuitively, using its ideal value (noise-free image) benefits FCM's robustness enhancement. Therefore, the realization of accurate noise estimation in FCM is a new and important task. To date, only two noise-estimation-based FCM algorithms have been proposed for image segmentation, that is: 1) deviation-sparse FCM (DSFCM) and 2) our earlier proposed residual-driven FCM (RFCM). In this article, we make a thorough comparative study of DSFCM and RFCM. We demonstrate that an RFCM framework can realize more accurate noise estimation than DSFCM when different types of noise are involved. It is mainly thanks to its utilization of noise distribution characteristics instead of noise sparsity used in DSFCM. We show that DSFCM is a particular case of RFCM, thus signifying that they are the same when only impulse noise is involved. With a spatial information constraint, we demonstrate RFCM's superior effectiveness and efficiency over DSFCM in terms of supporting experiments with different levels of single, mixed, and unknown noise.
Cong Wang, MengChu Zhou, Witold Pedrycz, Zhiwu Li (2022). Comparative Study on Noise-Estimation-Based Fuzzy <i>C</i>-Means Clustering for Image Segmentation. , 54(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2022.3217897.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2022
Authors
4
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2022.3217897
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access