Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Kurumsal BaşvuruSign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Kurumsal Başvuru

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Contact

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2026 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTermsContact
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. Comment on egusphere-2023-1966 tagging method

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Preprint
en
2023

Comment on egusphere-2023-1966 tagging method

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2023
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-1966-rc2

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Donald R Blake
Donald R Blake

University of California, Irvine

Verified
Huisheng Bian
Mian Chin
Peter R. Colarco
+19 more

Abstract

Abstract. The sulfur cycle plays a key role in atmospheric air quality, climate, and ecosystems. In this study, we compare the spatial and temporal distribution of four sulfur-containing species, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate methanesulfonate (MSA), and particulate sulfate (SO4), that were measured during the airborne NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission and simulated by five AeroCom-III models to analyze the budget of sulfur cycle from the models. This study focuses on remote regions over the Pacific, Atlantic, and Southern Oceans from near the ocean surface to ~12-km altitude range, and covers all four seasons. These regions provide us with highly heterogeneous natural and anthropogenic source environments, which is not usually the case for traditional continental studies. We examine the vertical and seasonal variations of these sulfur species over tropical, mid-, and high-latitude regions in both hemispheres. We identify their origins from land versus ocean and from anthropogenic versus natural sources with sensitivity studies by applying tagged tracers linking to emission types and regions. In general, the differences among model results can be greater than one-order of magnitude. Comparing with observations, simulated SO2 is generally low while SO4 is high, and the model-observation agreement is much better in ATom-4 (April–May, 2018). There are much larger DMS concentrations simulated close to the sea surface than observed, indicating that the DMS emissions may be too high from all models. Anthropogenic emissions are the dominant source (40–60 % of the total amount) for atmospheric sulfate simulated at locations and times along the ATom flight tracks at almost every altitude, followed by volcanic emissions (18–32 %) and oceanic sources (16–32 %). Similar source contributions can also be derived at broad ocean basin and monthly scales, indicating that any reductions of anthropogenic sulfur emissions would have global impacts in modern times.

How to cite this publication

Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Peter R. Colarco, Eric C. Apel, Donald R Blake, K. D. Froyd, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, J. L. Jiménez, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost, Michael J. Lawler, Mingxu Liu, Marianne T. Lund, Hitoshi Matsui, Benjamin A. Nault, Joyce E. Penner, Andrew W. Rollins, Gregory P. Schill, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Hailong Wang, Lu Xu, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu (2023). Comment on egusphere-2023-1966 tagging method. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1966-rc2.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Preprint

Year

2023

Authors

22

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1966-rc2

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access