0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Aims Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions. Design, Setting and Participants We used a Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts. This was an on‐line study. During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts ( n = 54) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review. Measurements Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development: targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients and modes of delivery. Findings Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty‐titration, bias modification, goal‐setting, strategy learning and meta‐awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment work‐force and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital‐based delivery modalities. Conclusions Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for substance use disorders highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation and higher‐order cognitive skills via well‐validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.
Antonio Verdejo‐García, Tara Rezapour, Emily Giddens, Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi, Parnian Rafei, Jamie Berry, Alfonso Caracuel, Marc L. Copersino, Matt Field, Eric L. Garland, Valentina Lorenzetti, Leandro Fernandes Malloy‐Diniz, Victoria Manning, Ely M. Marceau, David Pennington, Justin C. Strickland, Reínout W. Wiers, Rahia Fairhead, Alexandra C. Anderson, Morris D. Bell, Wouter J. Boendermaker, Samantha J. Brooks, Raimondo Bruno, Salvatore Campanella, Janna Cousijn, W. Miles Cox, Andrew C. Dean, Karen D. Ersche, Ingmar H. A. Franken, Brett Froeliger, Pedro Gamito, Thomas E. Gladwin, Priscila Dib Gonçalves, Katrijn Houben, Joanna Jacobus, Andrew Jones, Anne Marije Kaag, Johannes Lindenmeyer, Elly McGrath, Talia Nardo, Jorge Oliveira, Charlotte R. Pennington, Kelsey Perrykkad, Hugh Piercy, Claudia I. Rupp, Mieke H.J. Schulte, Lindsay M. Squeglia, Petra K. Staiger, Dan Joseph Stein, Jeff Stein, Maria Stein, William W. Stoops, Mary M. Sweeney, Katie Witkiewitz, Steven Paul Woods, Richard Yi, Min Zhao, Hamed Ekhtiari (2022). Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study. , 118(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16109.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2022
Authors
58
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16109
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access