0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessWhile there is a growing number of CO2 and CH4 studies from natural ecosystems, relatively few studies come from urban wetlands.Hence, this paper caught my attention as being a potentially important, new and novel contribution.What does the term urban wetlands mean and why may greenhouse gas exchange to and from it differ from other wetlands?To my mind, I would expect urban wetlands to be recycling water from urban uses and be subject to runoff from urban landscapes, which may have elevated levels of N applications, herbicides, oil runoff from roads etc. So. these factors may affect the redox ladder and alter methane fluxes compared to those from more remote wetlands.Let's see what the authors find.C1
Dennis Baldocchi (2019). Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from different surface types in a created urban wetland BG 2019-279. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-279-rc1.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Preprint
Year
2019
Authors
1
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-279-rc1
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access