0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe relevance ranking provided by the search engine was better than expected by chance and shows promise for the preliminary evaluation of large results from Boolean searches. A statistical search engine does not appear to be able to make fine discriminations concerning the relevance of bibliographic records that have been pre-screened by systematic reviewers.
Margaret Sampson, Nicholas Barrowman, David Moher, Tammy Clifford, Robert W. Platt, Andra Morrison, Terry P. Klassen, Li Zhang (2006). Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study. , 6(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-7.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2006
Authors
8
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-7
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access
.webp){kind=avatar}
