0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessThe alignment of the environmental, economic and social sustainability of farms is necessary for enhancing the pro-vision of public goods in farming. This study combines the use of three tools for the assessment of farm sustainability. It provides first insights into the sustainability performance of farms at different stages of agro-ecological transitions in 15 case studies covering a range of different farming systems across Europe. Each case study reflects a different transition towards agro-ecological farming. The tools applied were COMPAS (an economic farm assessment tool); Cool Farm Tool (a greenhouse gas inventory, water footprint and biodiversity assessment tool); and the SMART Farm Tool (a ultidimensional sustainability assessment tool).First results of the use of combined sustainability assessments deepen the understanding of different farming systems. Sustainability performance varies greatly between farms, but overall, agro-ecological farms tend to enhance biodiversity and water quality. For soil quality, no clear patterns could be identified. The same applies to economic performance at different stages of the agro-ecological transition. Quality of life was generally rated medium to high on all investigated farms. The combined sustainability assessment enabled the identification of areas for further policy development. Aligning the tools required harmonising definitions, simplification and assumptions with regard to the input data of the tools.
Jan Landert, Catherine Pfeifer, Johannes Carolus, Gérald Schwarz, Fabrizio Albanito, Adrian Müller, Pete Smith, Jürn Sanders, Christian Schader, Francesco Vanni, Jaroslav Pražan, Lukas Baumgart, Johan Blockeel, Rainer Weißhaidinger, Ruth Bartel-Kratochvil, Alexander Hollaus, Andreas Mayer, Andrea Hrabalová, Janne Helin, Jyrki Aakkula, Kristina Svels, Emmanuel Guisepelli, Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou, George Vlahos, Yiannis Iordanidis, Alfréd Szilágyi, László Podmaniczky, Katalin Balázs, Francesco Galioto, Davide Longhitano, Letizia Rossignolo, Andrea Povellato, Andis Zīlāns, Gražvydas Jegelevičius, Mihaela Frățilă, Uxue Iragui Yoldi, Carlos Astrain Massa, Jon Bienzobas Adrián, Kajsa Resare Sahlin, Elin Röös, Rebekka Frick, Richard Bircher, Inge Aalders, Katherine N. Irvine, Carol Kyle, David Miller (2020). Assessing agro-ecological practices using a combination of three sustainability assessment tools. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.3220/lbf1612794225000.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
46
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3220/lbf1612794225000
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access