0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract With the ever‐increasing population of aged individuals at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD), there is an urgent need for a sensitive, specific, non‐invasive, and diagnostic standard. The majority of efforts have focused on auto‐antibodies against amyloid‐β (Aβ) protein, both as a potential treatment, and a reliable biomarker of AD pathology. Naturally occurring antibodies against Aβ are found in the CSF and plasma of patients with AD as well as healthy control subjects. To date, differences between diseased and control subjects have been highly variable. However, some of the antibody will be in preformed antigen–antibody complexes and the extent and nature of such complexes may provide a potential explanation for the variable results reported in human studies. Thus, measuring total amounts of antigen or antibody following unmasking is critical. Here, using a technique for dissociating antibody–antigen complexes, we found significant differences in serum antibodies to Aβ between AD and aged‐matched control subjects. While the current study demonstrates the relevance of measuring total antibody, bound and unbound, against Aβ in AD, this technique may be applicable to diseases such as acquired immune deficiency syndrome and hepatitis B where determination of antigen and antibody levels are important for disease diagnosis and assessing disease progression.
Katarzyna Gustaw, Matthew R. Garrett, Hyoung‐gon Lee, Rudy J. Castellani, Michael G. Zagorski, A. Prakasam, Sandra L. Siedlak, Xiongwei Zhu, George Perry, Robert B. Petersen, Robert P. Friedland, Mark A. Smith (2008). Antigen–antibody dissociation in Alzheimer disease: a novel approach to diagnosis. , 106(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05477.x.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2008
Authors
12
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05477.x
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access