0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessAbstract Azole antifungal drugs are commonly used in antifungal chemotherapy. Antibacterial effects of some topical antifungals, such as miconazole and econazole, have lately been revealed, which suggests a promising venue in antimicrobial chemotherapy. In this study, we tested an in‐house azole collection with antifungal properties for their antibacterial activity to identify dual‐acting hits using the broth microdilution method. The in vitro screen yielded a number of potent derivatives against gram‐positive bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Compound 73 's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value less than 1 μg/ml against S. aureus ; however, none of the compounds showed noteworthy activity against methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA). All the active compounds were found safe at their MIC values against the healthy fibroblast cells in the in vitro cytotoxicity test. Molecular docking studies of the most active compounds using a set of docking programs with flavohemoglobin (flavoHb) structure, the proposed target of the azole antifungals with antibacterial activity, presented striking similarities regarding the binding modes and interactions between the tested compounds and the antifungal drugs with crystallographic data. In addition to being noncytotoxic, the library was predicted to be drug‐like and free of pan‐assay interference compounds (PAINS). As a result, the current study revealed several potential azole derivatives with both antifungal and antibacterial activities. Inhibition of bacterial flavoHb was suggested as a possible mechanism of action for the title compounds.
Suat Sarı, Ahmet Avci, Ebru Koçak Aslan, Didem Kart, Suna Sabuncuoğlu, İnci Selin Doğan, Zeynep Özdemir, İrem Bozbey, Arzu Karakurt, Selma Saraç, Sevim Dalkara (2020). Antibacterial azole derivatives: Antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and in silico mechanistic studies. , 81(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21721.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2020
Authors
11
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21721
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access