Raw Data Library
About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User Guide
Green Science
​
​
EN
Sign inGet started
​
​

About
Aims and ScopeAdvisory Board Members
More
Who We Are?
User GuideGreen Science

Language

Sign inGet started
RDL logo

Verified research datasets. Instant access. Built for collaboration.

Navigation

About

Aims and Scope

Advisory Board Members

More

Who We Are?

Add Raw Data

User Guide

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Support

Got an issue? Email us directly.

Email: info@rawdatalibrary.netOpen Mail App
​
​

© 2025 Raw Data Library. All rights reserved.
PrivacyTerms
  1. Raw Data Library
  2. /
  3. Publications
  4. /
  5. An integrated approach to above- and below-ground ecological monitoring for nature-based solutions

Verified authors • Institutional access • DOI aware
50,000+ researchers120,000+ datasets90% satisfaction
Preprint
en
2024

An integrated approach to above- and below-ground ecological monitoring for nature-based solutions

0 Datasets

0 Files

en
2024
DOI: 10.32942/x2g62s

Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.

Create free accountHow it works

Frequently asked questions

Is access really free for academics and students?

Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.

How is my data protected?

Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.

Can I request additional materials?

Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.

Advance your research today

Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.

Get free academic accessLearn more
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration
Access Research Data

Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.

Get Free Access
Institutional SSO
Secure
This PDF is not available in different languages.
No localized PDFs are currently available.
Pete Smith
Pete Smith

University of Aberdeen

Verified
Emily Warner
Licida Giuliani
Grant L. Campbell
+4 more

Abstract

1. As the development of nature-based solutions (NbS) increases globally, it is important to ensure that projects meet the objective of benefiting biodiversity, alongside tackling societal challenges. However, most NbS projects do not directly monitor ecological outcomes, and those that do often focus on a limited set of metrics. It is therefore challenging to assess whether projects fulfil the aim of benefiting biodiversity. 2. We aimed to identify the most informative and feasible ecological metrics, both above- and below-ground, for monitoring ecological outcomes of NbS. We conducted a structured non-systematic literature review to identify possible biodiversity and soil health metrics, then developed a scoring system to rank these based on their informativeness and feasibility for monitoring. 3. Metrics were categorised into compositional, structural, and functional aspects of biodiversity, and biological, physical, and chemical aspects of soil health. We grouped biodiversity and soil health metrics into Tier 1 (the most informative and feasible metrics), Tier 2 (informative metrics with some limitations in scope or feasibility), and Future metrics (highly informative metrics which are currently less feasible to monitor). Tier 1 metrics collectively address multiple aspects of biodiversity and soil health and are currently the highest priority for NbS projects to assess. For biodiversity nine Tier 1, six Tier 2, and 15 Future metrics were identified, and for soil health 11 Tier 1, six Tier 2, and five Future metrics. 4. We identified existing standardised methodologies for monitoring the proposed metrics, noting that for many metrics standardised methodologies are not available and threshold or reference values for each metric are missing. 5. Solution: Our study provides practitioners with a framework for selecting optimum metrics for assessing above- and below-ground ecological outcomes of NbS relevant to the place in which they are being implemented. A definition of each metric and standardised methodologies for collecting data are summarised, providing information to develop an ecological monitoring protocol for an NbS project. The information on each metric has been made freely available as a searchable database in an interactive online interface geared towards UK practitioners, but with wider applicability.

How to cite this publication

Emily Warner, Licida Giuliani, Grant L. Campbell, Pete Smith, Nathalie Seddon, Dan Seddon, Alison Smith (2024). An integrated approach to above- and below-ground ecological monitoring for nature-based solutions. , DOI: https://doi.org/10.32942/x2g62s.

Related publications

Why join Raw Data Library?

Quality

Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.

Control

Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.

Free for Academia

Students and faculty get instant access after verification.

Publication Details

Type

Preprint

Year

2024

Authors

7

Datasets

0

Total Files

0

Language

en

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/x2g62s

Join Research Community

Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.

Get Free Access