An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data

Zelalem Negeri, Brooke Levis, John P A Ioannidis, Brett D. Thombs, Andrea Benedetti, Ying Sun, Chen He, Ankur Krishnan, Yin Wu, Parash Mani Bhandari, Dipika Neupane, Mahrukh Imran, Danielle B. Rice, Marleine Azar, Matthew J. Chiovitti, Kira E. Riehm, Jill Boruff, Pim Cuijpers, Simon Gilbody, Lorie A. Kloda, Scott B. Patten, Roy C. Ziegelstein, Sarah Markham, Liane Comeau, Nicholas Mitchell, Simone N. Vigod, Muideen O. Bakare, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Adomas Bunevičius, Tiago Castro e Couto, Genesis Chorwe‐Sungani, Nicolas Favez, Sally Field, Lluı̈sa Garcia-Esteve, Simone Honikman, Dina Sami Khalifa, Jane Kohlhoff, Laima Kusminskas, Zoltán Kozinszky, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Susan Pawlby, Tamsen Rochat, Debbie Sharp, Johanne Smith‐Nielsen, Kuan‐Pin Su, Meri Tadinac, S. Darius Tandon, Pavaani Thiagayson, Annamária Töreki, A. Torres, Thandi van Heyningen, Johann M. Vega‐Dienstmaier (2024). An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data. , 24(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02134-w.