Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaboration0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Join our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free AccessBackground: Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well-established and partly attributed to sex hormones. Aim: We aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary ( TGNB ) adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized patient electronic medical records from a single community healthcare center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged ≥18 years with ≥2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups as TGNB (transgender man[TGM], transgender woman[TGW], nonbinary-assigned male at birth, nonbinary-assigned female at birth) and cisgender (cisgender man[CisM] or cisgender woman[CisW]). We categorized arrhythmias as atrial, ventricular, or other. Descriptive statistics characterized the prevalence of arrhythmias by gender group. Age- and race-adjusted Firth-type logistic regression models compared TGNB patients to CisM and CisW. The prevalence of arrhythmias was also descriptively explored in nonbinary people and in TGNB people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. Results: Among 49,862 adults, 7121 (14%) identified as TGNB persons. Participants were young (median age 28 years-old) and prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% in nonbinary persons, 1.4-1.5% in transgender persons). Adjusting for age and race, TGM and TGW had a similar risk of arrhythmias compared to CisM (TGW: OR=0.89 (0.63-1.24), p=0.52; TGM: OR=1.17 (0.82-1.62), p=0.37), but statistically significantly higher odds of arrhythmias compared to CisW (TGW: OR=1.65 (1.13-2.34), p=0.01; TGM: OR=2.15 (1.48-3.04), p<0.01). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among TGNB adults who used GAHT and those who did not (1.5% vs 1.9% in TGM, 1.2% vs 2.1% in TGW). Conclusion: Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.
Ayelet Shapira‐Daniels, Dana King, Sari L. Reisner, Lauren B. Beach, Oseiwe Eromosele, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Robert Helm, Emelia Benjamin, Carl G. Streed (2023). Abstract 14018: Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients. , 148(Suppl_1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.14018.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2023
Authors
9
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.14018
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access