0 Datasets
0 Files
Get instant academic access to this publication’s datasets.
Yes. After verification, you can browse and download datasets at no cost. Some premium assets may require author approval.
Files are stored on encrypted storage. Access is restricted to verified users and all downloads are logged.
Yes, message the author after sign-up to request supplementary files or replication code.
Join 50,000+ researchers worldwide. Get instant access to peer-reviewed datasets, advanced analytics, and global collaboration tools.
✓ Immediate verification • ✓ Free institutional access • ✓ Global collaborationJoin our academic network to download verified datasets and collaborate with researchers worldwide.
Get Free Access9502 Background: Lentigo maligna (LM) is a form of melanoma in situ that occurs mainly on sun exposed skin. For patients with LM who are not suitable for surgery due to location, size, patient preference or co-morbidities, topical imiquimod or radiotherapy are alternative non-surgical treatments. There are no prospective randomized controlled trial data to form the basis of any recommendations for the management of LM. This multi-institutional, international randomized phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of imiquimod verus radiotherapy for patients with LM. The primary hypothesis was that treatment of LM with topical imiquimod would result in fewer treatment failures than radiotherapy. Methods: Patients aged > 18 years old with LM not suitable for surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to imiquimod or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within 24 months. Secondary endpoints included development of invasive disease within the area, side effects and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) assessed with validated questionnaires (skin-specific Skindex-16 and generic EQ-5D-5L). Results: Between August 2015 and November 2021, 126 patients were randomised from 8 centres (imiquimod 60, radiotherapy 58 in final analysis). The median age was 72 years and 94.9% of lesions were on the head and neck area. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 3-62 months). Six (10.5%) patients in the imiquimod group and 12 (24.0%) patients in the radiotherapy group developed recurrence within 24 months (OR 2.68, 95% CI, 0·92-7.8, p = 0.063). Median time to recurrence was not reached in either group. Treatment failure was significantly different within the subgroup of patients who had reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) follow up of the LM (imiquimod 4/46, 8.7% radiotherapy 13/52 25.0%; OR 3.50 95% CI 1.05-11.65, p = 0.033). Only one RCM feature was associated with failure at 24 months and significantly different between treatment groups : the presence of atypical round cells at the dermal-epidermal junction (6.9 % of imiquimod failure and 27% of radiotherapy failure: p = 0.035). There were no differences between trial groups in patient-reported skin symptoms (itching, burning/stinging, pain, irritation), skin-specific emotional and functional QOL impacts, or generic QOL at any time points. Conclusions: Both imiquimod and radiotherapy are valid, well-tolerated and efficient non-surgical options for LM. There is no significant difference in the acute or long term QoL for the two treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02394132 .
Angela Hong, Serigne Lo, Gerald B. Fogarty, Jonathan R. Stretch, Wei Wang, Pablo Fernández‐Peñas, Richard C. Martin, Matthew Foote, H. Peter Soyer, Jeremy Ruben, Victoria Mar, Lílian Rocha, Christopher Wratten, Helena Collgros, Amanda Pereira, Bruna Melhoranse Gouveia, Richard A Scolyer, Madeleine King, Pascale Guitera (2024). A randomised, controlled, multicentre trial of imiquimod versus radiotherapy for lentigo maligna.. , 42(16_suppl), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.9502.
Datasets shared by verified academics with rich metadata and previews.
Authors choose access levels; downloads are logged for transparency.
Students and faculty get instant access after verification.
Type
Article
Year
2024
Authors
19
Datasets
0
Total Files
0
Language
en
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.9502
Access datasets from 50,000+ researchers worldwide with institutional verification.
Get Free Access